Roland Mainz wrote:
> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry. I was supposed to contact you after the last PSARC meeting.
>>
>> There is no serious fast-track specification for this case. If we are
>> unable to proceed with out one. The project team needs to produce one.
>>
>> At a minimum, such a proposal needs a very clear list of the effected
>> utilities and the rationale for the list of effected utilities.
>>
>
> Does that mean I have to make an ARC case for _each_ _single_ _binariy_
> I make 64bit clean ?
>
No. Two points:
1) Making a binary 64-bit "clean", but not delivering a 64-bit binary
(still just delivering the 32-bit binary) is just a bug fix, and well
below ARC radar. You can do that anytime you like, subject to CTeam.
2) If you're going to deliver 64-bit binaries, you can provide a single
case listing multiple binaries. If you're also removing (or converting)
a 32-bit binary, please make that explicit in the case.
-- Garrett
> ----
>
> Bye,
> Roland
>
>
