John Plocher wrote: > [Roland and I are bouncing a proposal back and forth...] > > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> 4) analysis of big-picture performance issues, if any (does 64-bit >> run faster, or slower? maybe run a some test of boot time analysis.) > > IIRC, the SPARC impact was "doesn't run faster" combined with > "takes more disk space", rather than "runs significantly slower".
+1 ARC review is only to cover speed and size issues when they are large enough to have some architectual impact. In my estimation, these don't qualify. >> 5) a rough estimate in the increase of the size of the media/miniroot >> for the SPARC port > > While interesting, this is IMO not an architectural issue, not part > of this case (which isn't proposing to make a complete 64-bit > miniroot), and with the way we are going with IPS and the size of > disks (CD, DVD and rust) this is probably not a practical concern > even if it ends up doubling the size (which I doubt it will). +0.8 I agree that this isn't an architecture issue, but its not just rust. At about nv60, the GUI installation died on 512 mb laptops because the miniroot couldn't run (in gui mode). Its not an architectual concern, but it is a practical concern. - jek3
