"Garrett D'Amore" <gdamore at sun.com> wrote:

> I agree whole heartedly.  I think the "fix" presented for touch, which 
> is to deliver 64-bit only, is incomplete, since it doesn't help 32-bit 
> kernels which are still interesting.

I am not sure if this applies to all problems but many  of the file time stamp 
problems are not visible on top of 32 bit kernels as the kernel already did
truncate the range of the time stamp before the stat(2) call is applied.

J?rg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de     (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Reply via email to