Roland Mainz wrote: > Well, I can fix that assuming we declare that a "bug fix", including the > use of isaexec (the first person who says we need an ARC case will a) > volunteer to fix the bug himself and will then b) be thrown in a pit > with komodo dragons (and I'll make sure they're small so they need > _days_ to finish the victim off)). > See: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/09/world/main4162807.shtml
At the danger of being thrown to these dragons, it would be useful to capture the list of items where a 64-bit version is needed. Perhaps just a CR which listed the known violators. I suspect that the current situation is that they are captured in a number of CRs, which probably accounts for this slow trickle of "BTW: ..." postings. (I mention this that something in the sac database would be particularly useful, but that certainly isn't a requirement.) Just a thought.... - jek3
