Jerry Gilliam wrote:
>
>> I requested that the team not create a new DDI_QUIESCE command. The
>> expansion of detach(9e) and attach(9e) with new interfaces was, IMO, a
>> big mistake.
>>
>>
>
>
> Garrett, I agree, and doing this would make providing functions
> that implement common behaviors that drivers can simply plug into
> the devops cleaner. Simply jettisoning the ddi_quiesce_t command
> and the for now NULL argument would be a cleaner design.
>
I actually agree with you wholeheartedly. I think they used the command
for possible future expansion, following precedent set by other DDI
entry points.
-- Garrett
