Sherry Moore wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The project team has resolved most issues offline with various
> parties. I have attached the updated versions of the specs reflecting
> the resolution. Please send me mail if you don't believe issues you
> raised have been addressed.
>
> Scott Rotondo will be posting summary with regard to interaction
> between this project and PSARC 2008/195 "Validated Execution".
>
> Thanks much,
> Sherry
>
I'd still prefer ddi_quiesce_not_supported were removed. I don't think
it has any merit as a documented API. (Again, if the project team wants
to use it as a private API to aid during the transition, that's fine.
But I'd rather not see new drivers adopt this API.)
-- Garrett
