Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I agree that it could use wider exposure. However, I still think it > desirable to keep some of the "riff-raff" out of the meetings. By > that, I'd like to see the meeting announcement passed around > opensolaris-code, where developers, and hopefully savvy people hang > out... but I do not think it a good idea to expose these to the larger > communities like opensolaris-discuss, or other groups that don't have > an engineering-driven focus.
My immediate thoughts were on advertising in groups such as dtrace-discuss, zfs-discuss, networking-discuss, etc - the relevant communities for those doing the engineering work. In cases where there are projects that have their own list, such as crossbow and others, it may also be worthwhile an additional email there, too. My feeling, at the present, is that we're inadvertently leaving the greater community out of a significant event in a project's life cycle and that we should try to be more inclusive. Darren > Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote: > >> At present the agendas for PSARC meetings go to this alias >> and any who are interested can dial in for the open sessions. >> >> For people in the community, there is often no mention of: >> a) when a project is going to PSARC for review >> b) what projects are being reviewed by PSARC >> >> I'd like for us to consider at least pushing out a copy of the >> agenda for the next meeting to include the community discussion >> groups (not just those for projects) that are relevant to the >> projects concerned. >> >> At least one goal here is to drive wider awareness of what >> PSARC is and also hopefully wider interest and participation. >> >> Comments? >> >> Darren >> >
