> Gary Winiger writes:
> > Evolving to Uncommitted is requested in light of a future planned but,
> > not yet scheduled, project to integrate the device allocation functionality
> > under Tamarack: Removable Media Enhancements in Solaris (PSARC/2005/399)
> > for all of the Solaris configurations.
>
> Does this mean that Sun Ray will need and get a contract? I don't see
> one in the case directory.
This one is mine, not the project team's. In clarifying the
output, Unstable -> Not-An-Interface, I suggested
Evolving -> Uncommitted. It seemed to me that even with
Uncommitted, full notification of incompatible change/EOL/EOF
processing is needed and the boundary is Minor. So, just like
non-Sun consumers, unbundled Sun consumers would be adequately
notified.
Of course, if members believe it's necessary/desirable, a contract
can be drawn. As I'm presently away -- and Ashish is likely
optimistic about my return date -- let's not hold things up
only for a contract.
Gary..
