Michael Bender writes: > Huh, that's an interesting statement, James. What does Sun Ray have to > do with this specific case and with how TX handles device allocation?
To be honest, I cannot tell. I know that two of the three separate issues presented are related to Sun Ray operation, and assumptions it makes about device allocation. I can't tell if the middle one is also related or if it's just a bonus issue. > I'm also not so sure what you mean by "baroque" - are you referring to > the HAL and GNOME bits? Could you clarify your statement please? I'm referring (again) to the use of multiple success codes. I think that's grotesque. As I said before (though Scott Rotondo disagreed), I'm willing to give up if it makes sense to the consumers. I'm not willing to redesign it here, especially given the resistance. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
