James Carlson wrote: >[nit: usually, the project team isn't part of the opinion review, >because we've already had the vote. Not a problem, though.] > >
Sure, I just wasn't sure if the protocol was to cc the team on the draft opinion. >>6.2. Case incomplete without unmount >> >> >[...] > > >>This advice was taken up and a solution presented before the >>next PSARC meeting, allowing the project to be voted on and >>formally approved. >> >> > >This doesn't look like advisory information, because we're not asking >the project team or management or anyone to do anything. Instead, it >looks like a note for section 4. > > I put this here because it more or less follows on from the paragraph directly before it and thus it seemed like the logical place for it to go. Darren
