Robert Thurlow wrote: > We have a proposal to address the mount vs. unmount gap that was > identified at the CIFS Client inception review. The proposal > makes use of the fact that the umount(1M) looks for fs-specific > binaries in the same manner as mount, permitting a similar design. > We will deliver a /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/umount binary that will use > the same method to grant unmount privileges, and add permissions > checking as appropriate. The materials changes are as follows: > > mount_smbfs(1M) man page: > Add information about umount_smbfs(!M) and language that unmounting > will also be permitted by regular users with the same restrictions
Just to tie up a loose end, will umount_smbfs be a "Committed" exported interface? Darren
