On 11/27/08 06:32, Edward Hunter wrote: > Thanks. Now I get to ask a question about the case. :-) > > One of the big "surprises" with Firefox 3.x is that "clear private > data" does not actually clear all your browsing history. There is an > ugly work around for involving editing your configuration directly > with about:config. By any chance does 3.1 make this better? > > While I would not derail this case for that, it does appear to have > some privacy implications and while that may be okay when I just > download it from Mozilla maybe we want the Solaris version to be more > conservative (aka doing what I want). > -edh > The bug has been fixed. see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329741
Brian > > On 11/26/08 14:16, John Fischer wrote: >> Ed, >> >> Due to the overwhelming explanation I withdraw my concerns. >> >> John >> >> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> >>> John Fischer wrote: >>> >>>> Actually the copyright information is added by sac_nextcase. >>>> Perhaps we should modify that when the case is open. >>>> >>> That was intentionally added by plocher when he did the mods to make open >>> cases - it always used to have the information protection warning before, >>> since the mods, if the case is open the header instead says Copyright Sun, >>> if the case is closed it instead has the information protection warning >>> (which I won't name here since it would make this case closed due to the >>> filters). >>> >>> What problem do you see in stating that Sun owns the copyright on the >>> one-pager/review form? >>> >>> -- >>> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com >>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering >>> >>> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20081127/e03040b7/attachment.html>
