On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 23:32 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:43:56PM +0800, steve xue wrote: > > > Danek found this also, he mentioned that since libguilereadline will be > > shipped here that will have some potential risk about being conflict to > > some future individual 'readline' library porting. > > It wasn't so much that there was a conflict, just that libguilereadline > links against the readline library, which we don't (currently) ship. So > there's not much point in shipping libguilereadline, either. Though > readline could be linked in statically until such time as we make a dynamic > readline library available.
???Danek, ??????I'm okay to not shipping it. Seems ???libguilereadline is different between mine and yours. ???I'm not sure it is correct place to continue this discussion. If not, please point me out. My ???libguilereadline is not link against readline, $file /usr/lib/libguilereadline-v-17.so.17.0.3 /usr/lib/libguilereadline-v-17.so.17.0.3: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped Strange thing is when I run 'ldd /usr/lib/libguilereadline-v-17.so.17.0.3', there is no depend on libs. -Halton. > > Danek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080513/abbe5782/attachment.html>
