Darren J Moffat wrote: > Roger A. Faulkner wrote: >> I created it yesterday and named it: >> >> /lib/libshim.so.1 >> /lib/64/libshim.so.1 >> >> So I'm adding this item to the official proposal. > > With that name ? > > Isn't this more like 0 at 0.so.1, extendedFILE.so.1, madv.so.1 etc ? > > In other words I don't think it should be specified on a link line so > does it need to begin with lib.
+1 (nice catch) > Also isn't there a better name than the highly generic "shim" ? > > My suggestion would be: > > leading_underscore_synonyms.so.1 > Would be "underscore_syn.so.1" be enough? (I know we are supposed to be "linux familiar", but does that include "linix-prefers-really-long-and-awkward-names"? :-) :-) ;-) ) - jek3
