* Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> [2007-01-22 14:33]: > nit: > > this case may propose > > refinements to the handling of specific scenarios. > > this looks like a drafting error or temporary/interim wording. > it appears that this case *does* propose some specifics for /usr/gnu It does indeed. Will amend.
> I don't see enough guidance/expectation-setting regarding upgrade as > newer revisions of various GNU utilities become available. I had intended that the project teams proposing individual components would manage this by virtue of selecting stability levels for their interfaces. (The components not moving in lock step with one another, and so on.) Could you give an example question that such guidance might resolve? I'm happy to propose an initial position... Cheers Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems stephen.hahn at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
