On Jan 4, 2008 7:16 AM,  <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote:
> Nevada.  (Indiana, giving an incompatible user experience and scripting
> experience is not such a release even if it aspires to be one)

It is disingenuous at best to make such a claim when Indiana has made
no such claim that it is, as of yet, trying to be such a compatible
distribution.

Such criticism is unproductive at best at this early stage, especially
when it was made very clear that what was released is a prototype and
nothing more.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben

Reply via email to