"Shawn Walker" <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> Compatibility must be useful to be valuable, compatibility with
> unfinalised OpenSolaris distributions isn't very useful, while
> compatibility with Solaris is extremely useful given ISV support.
Fine, then "Solaris Express" behavior cannot create facts as this is
an unfinalized distribution.
> As such, it makes sense for Sun to be the primary definer of compatibility.
Compatibility should be defined by the people who contribute ideas and code and
who do things first, not by Sun unless Solaris is not really open.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
