[sorry ... hit 'send' too quickly]

James Carlson writes:
> Liane Praza writes:
> > I'm filing this on behalf of Alan Maguire.  I've submitted it as
> > Closed-Approved-Automatic, as I believe it's an obvious change.
> > However, if there's non-trivial discussion or concern, we'd be happy
> > to convert it back to a fasttrack.
> 
> I hope this is just trivial discussion (;-}), but it seems to me that
> having both "svccfg refresh" and "svcadm refresh" is potentially
> confusing for administrators.  I suspect that they're confused about
> the cfg/adm split already (we've certainly seen confusion with the
> zone* commands), and this just adds a little fuel.

If the definition of the "svccfg refresh" user interface provides all
the needed functionality needed for a generic SMF "refresh" operation,
and it seems it does, then is it possible to work towards making
"svcadm refresh" obsolete?

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to