Nicolas Williams wrote: > I like the refresh/restart split. > > Refresh implies that running service state/config can be updated without > disruption. Restart implies that processes will exit/be killed and be > restarted. The distinction makes a difference in terms of reliability.
It sounds like it behaves much as a "service foo reload" in RedHat. Was any thought given to using the same word for the subcommand? Is it too late to change? Or accept a synonym? Cheers, Jeremy
