On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:38:59AM -0800, Gary Winiger wrote: > > If WORKSTATION_OWNER=Workstation Owner (or CONSOLE_USER=...) will be > > added on upgrade then removing it manually cannot be a good way to > > express the legacy "-" from /etc/default/sys-suspend... The next > > upgrade would restore the default "console-owner" sys-suspend behaviour. > > The intent is that i.policyconf act to WORKSTATION_OWNER the > same as it does with AUTHS_GRANTED and PROFS_GRANTED. > If present or commented out, don't change. If absent add the > default.
> > > for "-" (none), comment out or remove the policy.conf(4) > > > WORKSTATION_OWNER key; The manpage doesn't say "remove" so I guess that's OK. Eventually there should be a case obsoleting /etc/default/sys-suspend, right? That manpage shouldn't say that "-" maps to "comment out _or remove_"... > > Instead, allowing and recommending an empty value to disable the feature > > may be the way to go. > > Just as with AUTHS_GRANTED and PROFS_GRANTED, WORKSTATION_OWNER > can contain an empty value. > > Gary.. > P.S. If you'd like to code review or test ;-) ..... I'll code review.
