Phi,
> >> And most importantly, it would seem to me that entering
> >> screen lock would be a required action in the set of selectable
> >> actions -- and from a security perspective the default.
> >> It certainly is a selectable option on MacOS:
> >> "Require password to wake this computer from sleep or screen
> >> saver" is what it is called.
> >
> >
> > Screen locking is not required. What policy are you referencing that
> > makes it a requirement?
>
> I thought you meant a separate action, but if you mean GPM must lock the
> screen before sleeping, etc., then yes, that will happen.
I'm not concerned that it be a separate GPM (either PSARC or
LSARC case) action, but that it be supportable during such
things as lid close/sleep/hibernate.
> >> How does this case provide for a screen lock on lid switching?
> >>
>
> This PSARC case doesn't directly handle the screen locking, but GPM
> will call the xscreensaver-command before the actions such as suspend
> or blank screen.
Too many GPMs, I presume you mean LSARC 2007/702 GPM. It would
be really good to have it specify its architectural operations.
Gary..
