Gary Winiger wrote: > Phi, > > >>>> And most importantly, it would seem to me that entering >>>> screen lock would be a required action in the set of selectable >>>> actions -- and from a security perspective the default. >>>> It certainly is a selectable option on MacOS: >>>> "Require password to wake this computer from sleep or screen >>>> saver" is what it is called. >>> >>> >>>Screen locking is not required. What policy are you referencing that >>>makes it a requirement? >> >>I thought you meant a separate action, but if you mean GPM must lock the >>screen before sleeping, etc., then yes, that will happen. > > > I'm not concerned that it be a separate GPM (either PSARC or > LSARC case) action, but that it be supportable during such > things as lid close/sleep/hibernate. > > >>>> How does this case provide for a screen lock on lid switching? >>>> >> >>This PSARC case doesn't directly handle the screen locking, but GPM >>will call the xscreensaver-command before the actions such as suspend >>or blank screen. > > > Too many GPMs, I presume you mean LSARC 2007/702 GPM. It would > be really good to have it specify its architectural operations.
Yes, I meant the LSARC case. Thinking about it now, I should have called my case Philadelphia to help avoid some confusion :) We'll work together with the JDS folks to detail more about the architectural operations. Phi
