James Carlson wrote:
>> I wouldn't mind seeing the draft documentation changes (and commitment
>> from the docs/man page folks to ship those) before we ship the
>> implementation.
>
> The draft documentation request seems quite fair here. Glenn?
>
> (I don't see how docs commitment is an architectural matter, though.
> That coordination -- making sure that resources are in place and
> associated documentation changes are committed -- is more of a C-team
> matter.)
Agreed (which is why I said "before we ship the implementation" i.e.
prior to integration.)
Erik
