Glenn Faden wrote:
> Erik Nordmark wrote:
>>
>> This part of the system is extremely complex and brittle - it isn't
>> built to be able to do per-zones routes. Hence being concerned about
>> customers creating invalid configurations is a concern to be taken
>> very seriously.
>>
>> Perhaps we should go back to the drawing port and design per zones
>> routes i.e., the ability for route(1m) to explicitly specify a zone
>> name and have that cause ire_zoneid to be set in the kernel.
> Perhaps, but the proposed solution meets the requirements of customers
> that have asked for this feature, and I'd like to get it integrated and
> backported in time for S10U6.
I'd encourage you at least reflect upon Ed's concerns before charging
full steam ahead - it is good to know whether there is a cliff in front
of you before you decide to dismiss the advise of others.
Erik
