> Is it unreasonable to suggest/recommend/request that the documentation be > edited for delivery into ON?
This component will be delivered via SFW and not ON - and while I share the concern about the discrepancy in the name, we also try to avoid making gratuitous changes to the files delivered components by the consolidation. Admitted, this is perhaps a small enough change that warrants it being done but in general I would recommend against it (perhaps a better idea would be to patch the file with a small note at the beginning indicating it refers to GNU tar but I would leave that to the project team to decide). > Cool. Will the man page reference both /usr/bin/gtar and /usr/gnu/bin/tar as > alternative ways of getting to the same program? (I.e. this may be another > case where the documentation needs to be edited to reflect actuality.) > > I understand a desire to minimize changes relative to upstream sources, but I > think accuracy of the documentation trumps (or should trump) that concern. I think that should be left to the project team. dsc
