On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: > work on resolving the issue but I believe that is orthogonal to this > case (remember, we're talking about a component that was already ARC > approved and integrated in the Nevada timeframe)
I did note in my original reply that implementation usually isn't architecture. However, in the long-run, shipping broken, approaching-useless software ought to raise architectural flags. If it's quite broke and we aren't going to fix it, it shouldn't be in Solaris. That's just MHO though ;). I'll shut up now :). regards, -- Paul Jakma, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems, Scotland http://opensolaris.org/os/project/quagga tel: EMEA x73150 / +44 15066 73150
