Mark A. Carlson wrote:
> David,
>
> I would like to see the AMT and CIM Schema exported by this project
> listed as a Committed interface in the interface table.
Hmm... I'm not sure how stable they are from Intel. Committed Volatile?
Again, this project is just an HTTP proxy in what it passes. The HTTP
*content* is beyond the projects control, as it is supplied by Intel
firmware.
-- Garrett
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- mark
>
> David Chieu wrote:
>> As you know, we've submitted PSARC 2007/601 Intel AMT case about a
>> month ago. There were a barrage of interested questions asked
>> immediately, so we've taken our case off of the fast-track and
>> started to prepare a more detailed documentation. With gracious helps
>> from some of the PSARC members, we've generated a "spec.txt" which is
>> numbered/initialed with detailed answers of already asked + expected
>> questions. We also have broken this doc into major pertinent areas of
>> Intel's AMT: intro, admin/config, security, network, use cases,
>> driver, proxy, virtualization, FMA, and potential customers. Please
>> see the case directory for either spec_amt_draft_v.1.6.pdf or
>> spec_amt_draft_v.1.6.sxw.
>>
>> Please note, the luminary index for Q&A:
>>
>> Garrett D'Amore = (gd)
>> James Carlson = (jc)
>> Bill Sommerfeld = (bs)
>> Nicolas Williams = (nw)
>> Paul Jakma = (pj)
>> Gary Winiger = (gw)
>> Randy Fishel = (rf)
>>
>> The timer for this case is now set to 12/05/2007
>>
>> -- The Solaris AMT team
