Vincent Wang wrote:
> AMT is currently an 'Intel only' technology.
What is obvious here is that of the two failure modes:
A) "being different from Intel" and
B) "evolving incompatibly",
the first is much much more undesirable.
Vincent's comment that "It has been evolving from v1.0 to v3.0.
And we've already heard about AMT 5.0" suggests strongly that this
project needs to include the version number AND to support the
coexistence of multiple versions on/in a system (i.e., this
project shouldn't be hardcoded to just support version 2.3...).
I'm not sure of the usage model, but it should be possible to
find out which version(s) of AMT is/are being exposed and to
tailor ones interactions appropriately...
-John