Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:

> I'm not saying that we should avoid using libshell in SMF at all costs,
> but I have yet to see a reason, let alone a compelling reason, for it
> to use libshell.


[Intentionally not stepping into the / -vs /usr debate here...]

[The whole issue of SMF/libshell is out of scope for this project: 
2006/550 - ksh93 integration]

Roland has given (IMHO) a very valid reason to do so - the SMF 
community (which includes Roland and other non-"Sun internal SMF team" 
people as well) is considering some interesting ways to innovate with 
SMF and libshell.  Now, it may be that the community isn't of one mind 
in this particular issue or it may be that this discussion is more 
about alternative visions of potential futures, but those are problems 
that the community gets to deal with, not the ARCs

In the "governance" conversation, if a community wishes to go down a 
path of discovery and experimentation to see if they can come up with 
interesting features, they are free to do so; nobody outside that 
community is empowered to make the "do we want to do this?" decisions 
for them.

Even the ARC process can't counteract that resolve; all it can do as 
it addresses the related question of "is this the best way to do it?" 
is to require the community to better articulate its desires (NEED 
SPEC or "REJECTED - go back and start over") or have it change the 
architecture/design of their proposed implementation (TCR/TCA).

Just because Sun engineers aren't playing in that particular part of 
the sandbox doesn't mean that nobody else will; nor does it imply that 
those other parts of the sandbox are inherently bad (always excepting 
cats, of course :-)

   -John

Reply via email to