>In general I am requesting the ARC people to burry this issue and let >the project team come up with a solution in peace - which means don't >rip out pfksh93 from this ARC case - there are at least three existing >ways to deal with the problem (see my other email) and IMO we have >plenty of time with deal with the problem since the intial putback >commits ksh93s-_alpha to OS/Net anyway - which means there will be a >couple of putbacks between now and the final version of ksh93s where we >can revisit this issue and hack a working solution together...
The pf*sh issue is somewhat broader than just the builtins. In the ideal world the pf*sh would just have a flag bit set and the kernel would take care of most of the rest. (So a pf*sh would not involve changing the code in the shell). For now, the easiest route I think is disabling all "non-standard" builtins for pfksh93. Casper
