Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote:
> The pf*sh issue is somewhat broader than just the builtins.
>
> In the ideal world the pf*sh would just have a flag bit set and the
> kernel would take care of most of the rest. (So a pf*sh would not
> involve changing the code in the shell).
So it looks like you are talking about something similar to one of my proposals
for trusted solaris that avoids having any suid-root program.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
