Richard Lowe wrote: [snip] > Does this mean that rather than merging the symbols of the two libcmds, > the ksh93 libcmd could go by another name (or location), without > affecting either ksh93 nor consumers of libshell?
No, this will not work. The resulting ksh93 binary would no longer be compatible to the upstream versions and would break a more than twelve year old compatibilty chain in a VERY bad way. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
