> From: Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org>
...
> Richard Lowe wrote:
> [snip]
> > Does this mean that rather than merging the symbols of the two libcmds,
> > the ksh93 libcmd could go by another name (or location), without
> > affecting either ksh93 nor consumers of libshell?
> 
> No, this will not work. The resulting ksh93 binary would no longer be
> compatible to the upstream versions and would break a more than twelve
> year old compatibilty chain in a VERY bad way.

I think I agree.

Although I think it would be nice structure if David Korn were to have
structured this as multiple shared objects (plugins) in a subdirectory
of /usr/lib, he chose not to and its mostly a matter of taste.  Unless
he (the upstream sources) relocate the library structure, I agree we
should also avoid doing so.

- jek3


Reply via email to