Don Cragun wrote: > We also propose to replace the file /usr/xpg6/bin/xargs with a link to > /usr/bin/xargs, so that old programs that may have hardcoded the path > to the XPG6 version of xargs can continue to operate properly.
Is this intended to be the architecture of reference for when we fully unify an xpg?/bin variant with its bin variant ? That is symlinks must be provided ? I'm okay if that is the case, I just want to know of this case is setting new case law. -- Darren J Moffat
