Don Cragun wrote: > If we end up removing a /usr/xpg*/bin utility due to a fix required by > an interpretation request (which intentionally changes behavior), a > project team may decide not to install a symlink. (I'm not concerned > about any precedent if this issue comes up; any project that does this > would be granted an exception if needed. I'm just saying that "always" > may be too strong.) > >> In case it isn't clear I think this case should be setting precedent. > > Is this a formal request to turn this into a fast track to set a > precedent? (If I remember correctly, a self-reviewed case can't set a > precedent.)
Before causing more "paper work" I'd like to hear what other members think. I'm currently thinking that just having had this discussion in the case may well be sufficient. -- Darren J Moffat
