Hi Erik, On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:05 -0700, Erik Lafever wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > It looks like this project makes no backward incompatible changes to any > > existing software. As such, Minor binding seems unnecessarily > > restrictive. Why not Patch?
Any thoughts on this? > > It appears that the project team has supplied man pages for each of > > these interfaces in the materials directory (thank you). Of note is the > > reference to the use of Tcl/Tk by pylint-gui(1), which suggests that > > there should be some additional related imported interfaces below. > Tk represents python's standard built in Tkinter interface, not tcl's. Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying. > > If > > Tcl/Tk is in fact used to drive the GUI, then what are the GNOME > > libraries used for? > > > The Gnome libraries are a requirement for SUNWlogilab-common. Should we > leave out > SUNWgnome-libs and SUNWgnome-python-libs as they are covered by the > dependencies > for SUNWlogilab-common? I'd leave them out, as they should already be imported by those interfaces that you depend on and are importing directly, yes. I see you've done that in your updated spec. > > > >> Imported Interfaces Classification Comment > >> ------------------- -------------- --------------------------- > >> SUNWPython Volatile Python interpreter, library > >> SUNWgnome-libs Volatile GNOME platform libraries > >> SUNWgnome-python-libs Volatile Python GNOME libraries > >> SUNWlogilab-common Uncommitted Python library > >> SUNWlogilab-astng Uncommitted Python library > >> > > > > I don't see the latter two packages in the existing repositories. Are > > they in fact being delivered by this case (and should therefore be part > > of the exported interfaces), or being delivered by a separate case (if > > so there is case dependency that should be called out)? > > > SUNWlogilab-common and SUNWlogilab-astng are separate cases: > SUNWlogilab-common http://sac.sfbay/arc/LSARC/2009/298/ > SUNWlogilab-astng > http://sac.sfbay/arc/LSARC/2009/299/ Great, thanks for clarifying that. +1 from me, modulo the clarification regarding release binding. -Seb
