Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:05 -0700, Erik Lafever wrote:
>   
>> Sebastien Roy wrote:
>>     
>>> It looks like this project makes no backward incompatible changes to any
>>> existing software.  As such, Minor binding seems unnecessarily
>>> restrictive.  Why not Patch?
>>>       
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>   
I followed the binding type that was used for SUNWlogilab-common and 
SUNWlogilab-astng
which SUNWpylint depends on.  I was trying to keep things consistent so 
I matched what was there.

Thanks,

-Erik


>   
>>> It appears that the project team has supplied man pages for each of
>>> these interfaces in the materials directory (thank you).  Of note is the
>>> reference to the use of Tcl/Tk by pylint-gui(1), which suggests that
>>> there should be some additional related imported interfaces below. 
>>>       
>> Tk represents python's standard built in Tkinter interface, not tcl's.
>>     
>
> Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying.
>
>   
>>>  If
>>> Tcl/Tk is in fact used to drive the GUI, then what are the GNOME
>>> libraries used for?
>>>   
>>>       
>> The Gnome libraries are a requirement for SUNWlogilab-common.  Should we 
>> leave out
>> SUNWgnome-libs and SUNWgnome-python-libs as they are covered by the 
>> dependencies
>> for SUNWlogilab-common?
>>     
>
> I'd leave them out, as they should already be imported by those
> interfaces that you depend on and are importing directly, yes.  I see
> you've done that in your updated spec.
>
>   
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>    Imported Interfaces     Classification  Comment
>>>>    -------------------     --------------  ---------------------------
>>>>    SUNWPython              Volatile        Python interpreter, library
>>>>    SUNWgnome-libs          Volatile        GNOME platform libraries
>>>>    SUNWgnome-python-libs   Volatile        Python GNOME libraries
>>>>    SUNWlogilab-common      Uncommitted     Python library
>>>>    SUNWlogilab-astng       Uncommitted     Python library
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I don't see the latter two packages in the existing repositories.  Are
>>> they in fact being delivered by this case (and should therefore be part
>>> of the exported interfaces), or being delivered by a separate case (if
>>> so there is case dependency that should be called out)?
>>>   
>>>       
>> SUNWlogilab-common and SUNWlogilab-astng are separate cases:
>>         SUNWlogilab-common          http://sac.sfbay/arc/LSARC/2009/298/   
>>         SUNWlogilab-astng                
>> http://sac.sfbay/arc/LSARC/2009/299/
>>     
>
> Great, thanks for clarifying that.
>
> +1 from me, modulo the clarification regarding release binding.
>
> -Seb
>
>
>   


Reply via email to