On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:24:10PM -0400, Will Young wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:19 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:06:53PM -0400, Will Young wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:11 -0700, Kais Belgaied wrote:
> > > > so, any dependency on a particular version of OpenSSL's lib{crypto,ssl} 
> > > > ?
> > > > 
> > > > doesn't this case require an ARC contract against PSARC/2003/500 for 
> > > > the 
> > > > import of OpenSSL ?
> > > 
> > > I no longer saw a need for a contract as of the integration of:
> > > 6806387 Move OpenSSL from ON to SFW
> > 
> > The move alone could not imply a change of interface stability.
> > PSARC/2006/555 (Move OpenSSL to /usr) did not change the interface
> > stability of any part of OpenSSL (see section 4.5 of the one-pager).
> 
>       It's my understanding that within one gate no contract is needed
> (updating any element of the gate one is responsible for
> examining/updating related elements.)  Is that not accurate?

Ah, sorry, another thinko on my part.

Reply via email to