On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:24:10PM -0400, Will Young wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:19 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:06:53PM -0400, Will Young wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:11 -0700, Kais Belgaied wrote: > > > > so, any dependency on a particular version of OpenSSL's lib{crypto,ssl} > > > > ? > > > > > > > > doesn't this case require an ARC contract against PSARC/2003/500 for > > > > the > > > > import of OpenSSL ? > > > > > > I no longer saw a need for a contract as of the integration of: > > > 6806387 Move OpenSSL from ON to SFW > > > > The move alone could not imply a change of interface stability. > > PSARC/2006/555 (Move OpenSSL to /usr) did not change the interface > > stability of any part of OpenSSL (see section 4.5 of the one-pager). > > It's my understanding that within one gate no contract is needed > (updating any element of the gate one is responsible for > examining/updating related elements.) Is that not accurate?
Ah, sorry, another thinko on my part.