Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:06:53PM -0400, Will Young wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:11 -0700, Kais Belgaied wrote:
>>> so, any dependency on a particular version of OpenSSL's lib{crypto,ssl} ?
>>>
>>> doesn't this case require an ARC contract against PSARC/2003/500 for the
>>> import of OpenSSL ?
>> I no longer saw a need for a contract as of the integration of:
>> 6806387 Move OpenSSL from ON to SFW
>
> The move alone could not imply a change of interface stability.
But it does change the need for contracts. At least LSARC, and I thought
PSARC as well, had accepted the precedent that Volatile interfaces were
similar to Consolidation Private, only needing contracts when consumed
outside the Consolidation, to avoid overwhelming the ARC's and engineers
with dozens of contracts between different parts of consolidations like
JDS, SFW, & X.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
