Neal Pollack wrote:
> ...
> At a time of pressure to control costs, why is this not common code?  
> Why are we setting up
> a sparc branch and an existing x86 branch?  Or are the two groups 
> working together to
> merge this support in a common driver (add support for sparc to the 
> existing x86 driver
> and place it in a common branch of the source tree)?

We aren't setting up a separate code branch.  The SPARC code will be in 
the common code base, and
that base will be modified to support SPARC as well as x86.  During the 
development cycle, the SPARC
code is separate, but it will be merged into the existing Xorg code.

  -- Eric


Reply via email to