Neal Pollack : > On 12/09/08 14:15, Eric Sultan wrote: >> Neal Pollack wrote: >>> ... >>> At a time of pressure to control costs, why is this not common >>> code? Why are we setting up >>> a sparc branch and an existing x86 branch? Or are the two groups >>> working together to >>> merge this support in a common driver (add support for sparc to the >>> existing x86 driver >>> and place it in a common branch of the source tree)? >> >> We aren't setting up a separate code branch. The SPARC code will be >> in the common code base, and >> that base will be modified to support SPARC as well as x86. During >> the development cycle, the SPARC >> code is separate, but it will be merged into the existing Xorg code. Will the kernel code be in X86 system? I think the kernel code may be SPARC specific.
>> >> -- Eric >> > > excellent, thanks. -- Best Regards, Ming. ------------------------------------------ -Edward Shu -Solaris x86 Engineering, Sun Microsystems -Blog: http://blogs.sun.com/sming56/ -tele: +86-10-62673100 __________________________________________
