James C. McPherson wrote:
> No doubt we'd need to have one for duff(1), dufflite(1) and duffzero(1), > and another one for fosters(1) too, with a See Also that mentions both > bud(1) and coors(1). Can these be made compatible? Instead of duplicating the code needlessly, perhaps we could have a single executable, ontap(1) with a "brand" flag, "-b" that would specify the particular flavor to dispense? If necessary, we could still have the individual commands via links to the ontap command, which would cause the ontap command to behave as if it were called like this: "ontap -b $0". -- blu There are two rules in life: Rule 1- Don't tell people everything you know ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Sun Microsystems, Inc. Ph:877-259-7345, Em:brian.utterback-at-ess-you-enn-dot-kom
