Gary Winiger wrote: >> Why can't it run as uid and gid daemon ? > > Or better yet, noaccess?
No not better at all IMO, as user accounts one is no better than the other. However is more current use of daemon than noaccess (kcfd, rpcbind, nfsd, statd, lockd, for starters) in Solaris services. Also daemons running as daemon looks reasonable, "noaccess" looks strange (to me anyway). -- Darren J Moffat
