On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:25:38PM -0700, Alan M Wright wrote: > >It's not needed by either the SMB server nor the SMB client? > > Other services (such as the SMB server or client) can specify nbtd > as a dependency but I think that's outside the scope of this fasttrack. > From the nbtd perspective, it is only started on demand, which may > be as a result of an 'svcadm enable -r ...'
Right, but I think the real question is: does this change how users are expected to enable the SMB service? And since the SMB service can be enabled indirectly via sharectl, IIRC, shouldn't sharectl learn to do this?
