Garrett D'Amore wrote: > ... > Darren, you were the one that raised the concern about possible > differences between libdlpi and actually using dlpi directly. Can you > elaborate any further on that? Is the issue that some interfaces > won't be available using certain names via pure DLPI? (Is this just > because of /dev/net versus /dev from Clearview? Perhaps libnet can be > made to understand to search in /dev/net first. That is probably a > much smaller effort than converting to use libdlpi.)
Yes, /dev/net. The correct way to interface with /dev/net should be via libdlpi. Darren
