Garrett D'Amore writes: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > Indeed. With Clearview UV, libnet would either have to be modified to > > either use libdlpi, or minimally be modified to open DLPI devices out > > of /dev/net in order to function with vanity naming. That part, at > > least, is architectural and needs to be addressed by this case. > > > > -Seb > > > > > > > > This sounds like it really needs to be a Big Question. Unfortunately, > with Clearview, the older style DLPI applications are busted as they > won't know how to locate devices.
They're not totally busted. They still work with the driver-given name in /dev. They just won't work with the administratively assigned name known to dladm and IP. I see it as a fit-and-finish problem. Things that integrate into Solaris ought to work properly with the local Solaris tools and features. Things that aren't integrated needn't necessarily work so well ... though it'd be nice if they did. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
