> This case was closed approved in last PSARC meeting.
> 
> Material was updated and saved as 'spec.txt' in case directory. In the 
> updated material, interface name '/dev/dsp' was changed to 
> '/dev/private_dsp' so that users won't stumble into it purely by
        ^^^^^^^^^^^
        Was that really agreed to by the committee?  I thought it was
        a proposal by the project team.  And the suggestion was to
        not expose things that can't be used but if exposure was necessary
        for code complexity reasons the expected name was reasonable to
        expose.
        Did I completely miss the committee's thrust?

Gary..

> accident as a consequence of using a famous path name. A new paragraph 
> was added to explain there will be no regression on SPARC and Sun x86 
> platforms on power management.

Reply via email to