> > Did I completely miss the committee's thrust? > > We agreed that as long as it was kept reasonably out of harm's way > until the stability is firmed up, we didn't much care how that was > done. > > I had assumed that meant "private_dsp," as Garrett said during ARC > business that he wasn't wild about the decision but that it wasn't > enough to belabor.
OK fine. I missed that and didn't find anything in the case
log of a conclusion.
Gary..
