Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at sun.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:24:55PM -0800, John Fischer wrote:
>
> > 4.2. Interfaces:
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Exported Stability Comments
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SUNWlibcddb Uncommitted Package
> > name
> > libcddb.so Volatile C library
> > CDDB protocol Volatile
>
> Erm, same comment on Volatile here as everywhere else. It's quite clear we
> need some mechanism that allows us to feel free to change these components,
> possibly breaking all consumers, on a frequent basis, but without the
> contract hell that Volatile requires.
>
> Regardless of that discussion, I'd say that if the CDDB protocol isn't
> Committed, then it should be Private, or maybe Committed Private.
The CDDB protocol is stable. It just introduces new protocol levels from time
to time.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
