I see other's have responded before I could.  I'd just
+1

Gary..
> There were issues at inception, indeed.  They had all been resolved 
> before commitment though.  I am uncertain what the procedure is for 
> noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment -- 
> certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment.
> 
> Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, but 
> exists in conjunction with the case materials.  Those case materials 
> (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found acceptable without 
> need or desire for change.  So I called out a reference to them, and 
> didn't mention it further.
> 
> Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is something 
> else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm happy to change 
> it.  In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little more guidance as 
> to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion.
> 
>     -- Garrett
> 

Reply via email to